
Frontier AI is discovering critical vulnerabilities like PHP2Shell faster than humans ever could, which means attackers can exploit these gaps just as quickly. Machine-speed attacks on external vulnerabilities require machine-speed defense to find and fix those exposures first.
of enterprise vulnerabilities remain unpatched after 12 months.
Source: Cloud Security Alliance. The Collapsing Exploit Window: AI-Speed Vulnerability Weaponization, April 2026.
From a company name, Kai finds what you expose. Every external exposure lands in the same queue and workflow as everything else Kai protects.
Start from a company name: the entity and its subsidiaries, each with source, evidence and confidence
Passive discovery by default, active steps only with a signed authorization
Each exposure records its rule and evidence, matched to assets Kai already knows
Nothing is in scope until you confirm it
API specs, LLM endpoints, MCP servers and leaked keys found from outside
Prioritize, assign owners and track SLAs in the queue you already run
1
2
3
4
A second console to watch
A second queue to reconcile
External findings matched to internal data by hand
Two answers for the board
One asset record, inside and outside
One queue and one accountable owner
Matched to assets Kai already knows
One answer for the board


Kai External Attack Surface Management is part of the Kai Autonomous Defense Platform. It discovers what your organization exposes to the internet, attributes each asset to you with evidence, and turns what it finds into exposures that land in the same queue as everything else Kai manages.

You give it a company name. Kai resolves it to a legal entity, you confirm the domains and subsidiaries, and it expands outward through certificates, passive DNS, archive data and internet scan data. Every asset carries a confidence score and the evidence behind it.

No. External findings are normalized into the same finding model as internal ones and pushed into the same asset record, ownership model and remediation workflow.